Home

Advertisement

Customize
 
 
28 August 2008 @ 12:51 pm
Things that were inaccurate in the first season of Supernatural  
I made this list when I got pissed off. It's basically me ranting and being an elitist snob.

The number 40 means death in Biblical numerology—It actually means a period of trial, chastisement, or probation

 

Every culture in the world has shapeshifter lore, but none of these shapeshifters can fly—What if they shapeshifted into a bird? Because there are definitely legends about people who can turn into animals, specifically skinwalkers, which were mentioned earlier in the episode as an example of a kind of shapeshifter

 

Tarot cards date from the early Christian era when priests were still using magic—Tarot cards date from the 1400s and were brought to Europe from the middle east through trade with the Mameluk Turks (incidentally, the original purpose of tarot cards was not divination, they were just a different type of playing cards)

 

A scarecrow that kills a man and a woman every year in the second week of April is actually an effigy of one the Vanir (which Dean mispronounced) from Norse Mythology, the killings are part of a fertility rite involving human sacrifice, and the Vanir can be killed by burning it’s sacred tree—Where do they get this shit from? Yes, the Vanir are fertility deities, but they did not possess scarecrows and they were not linked to sacred trees. They all had names, personalities, etc, meaning that no one would worship “a Vanir,” they would worship a specific Vanir, like Freya or Njord. Whether or not people were sacrificed to them is unclear, but it is NOT part of any of the written mythology. Human sacrifice did exist in Northern Europe, but it did NOT involve the ritual killing of a man and a woman once a year. The human sacrificial victims that have been found were staked down in bogs, usually after being killed by some combination of strangling, stabbing, or bludgeoning. They were killed in times of war, famine, etc. and there is very good evidence that they were willing sacrifices. Also, no one knows which gods they were sacrificed to because there were no written records. Basically, there would NEVER be a book where the section about Vanir had a picture of a scarecrow and a description of human sacrifice like the one Dean found.

 

Almost every world culture has legends about “reapers”—What? How are they defining reapers? Because in the show it was a creepy old man in a suit who could heal someone by killing someone else. Or just kill someone for the hell of it. This definitely does not appear in every world culture, nor does the more traditional reaper with a long black robe and scythe. I wouldn’t say that most world cultures even have spirits of death or a personification of death that could be called a “reaper.” If they just mean spirits that kill people, I think that’s a ridiculously broad category that encompasses way too many different kinds of spirits for them all to be based on specific supernatural phenomenon that can be controlled with a symbol from a tarot card and a spell in Latin.

 

A banshee is a vengeful spirit tied to a family—NO! Banshees are spirits tied to a specific family (clan) that scream when a member of that family is about to die. They are harbingers of death, but they do not cause the death. Really it’s more like a sign of grief or respect. But banshee lore is more complicated than that. A banshee appeared to Brian Boru (the last high king of Ireland) when he was on his way to fight the Vikings. She warned him that if he fought them he would die, but that his army would be victorious. The word ban-sidhe means “woman of the sidhe (fairies, Otherworld)” in Gaelic, and some legends of banshees involve a fairy woman or a human woman with some kind of otherworldly power, specifically prophecy.

 

Spring-heeled Jack is an example of a supernatural entity responsible for unexplained disappearances—The legends of Spring-heeled Jack are not associated with disappearances. He attacked people, but he didn’t snatch them or kidnap them or whatever they’re suggesting

 

The daevas of Zoroastrianism are brutal, animalistic demons incapable of speech or higher thought—The daevas could speak, and often were extremely intelligent and cunning

 
 
Current Location: La la land
Current Mood: bitchy
Current Music: Joan Baez
 
 
( Post a new comment )
languagegirl[info]languagegirl on August 28th, 2008 11:22 pm (UTC)
Firstly, I worship how much of this you know. Truly impressive. I knew some of it, but certainly not in this kind of detail.

Secondly, I feel the need to point out that in the post I just put up before reading this, I also stated that I am located in La la land. We're obviously connected psychically.
a little random but always classy[info]buckfush530 on September 14th, 2008 09:11 pm (UTC)
Every culture in the world has shapeshifter lore, but none of these shapeshifters can fly — What if they shapeshifted into a bird? Because there are definitely legends about people who can turn into animals, specifically skinwalkers, which were mentioned earlier in the episode as an example of a kind of shapeshifter

Not to mention I faintly remember one Celtic myth wherein a sorceress and her escaped apprentice attempt to outrun each other where he transforms into a sparrow among other things, and she chases him in the form of both a hawk and a chicken.

FAIL (them not you).

The daevas of Zoroastrianism are brutal, animalistic demons incapable of speech or higher thought — The daevas could speak, and often were extremely intelligent and cunning

In fact, the entire point of daevas in Zoroastrianism is that they're like sociopaths - they are tactically brilliant creatures that have realized that if they literally manipulate everything in their path without a care about what happens to the manipulated (ie: death among other fates) they can quite easily get whatever they want out of life.

In other words, their cunning and extreme intelligence is precisely what makes them dangerous. AGAIN EPIC FAIL.
a little random but always classy[info]buckfush530 on September 14th, 2008 09:22 pm (UTC)
Almost every world culture has legends about “reapers”

Sorry, I had to go outside and let loose a positive stream of profanities before I could add on this. The concept of "reaper" especially "grim reapers" is so incredibly European that I want to light things on fire for some one suggesting that it's universal.

Most cultures, y'know the ones that existed pre-colonialism, didn't even have plows, let alone reapers. Eurasia is a weird ass landmass, what with domesticated horses and all, y'know animals that make plows worth it. Most of the tropics don't have cereal crops, so a reaper-esque instrument is useless for the most part (I mean, it could be a weapon, but most people go for adzes or axes instead of something that unwieldy). Basically, there's an underlying assumption in the idea that nearly every one had reapers - that every one lived more or less like Europeans.

On top of that, outside of Europe, most of those reaper characters were symbols of wealth and prosperity, since they represented the fertility of the land. Europe ended up with a mixture of such symbols meaning similar things (ie: the cornicopia) and being associated with death or evil (ie: pitchforks, horns, reaper, etc) because of the ideological revolution of Christianity.

So again, they're all kinds of FAIL.

ALSO, this is why I never watched that show...
celzmccelz[info]celzmccelz on September 14th, 2008 11:32 pm (UTC)
This is why I love you. No one at Sarah Lawrence could appreciate your incensed ranting as much as I do.
a little random but always classy[info]buckfush530 on September 15th, 2008 04:11 am (UTC)
Actually, some one knew what I was talking about when I said that some peoples' Christianity is only as deep as a Jack Chick tract. I was amazed.
 
 

Advertisement

Customize